The thinking
We started by reframing the problem. The intake flow wasn't broken — it was working exactly as designed. The design was wrong. Six pages, fourteen minutes, and zero feedback during validation. The form treated patients like database rows, not people about to share medical history with strangers.
Our hypothesis: the form's perceived length was the largest single driver of abandonment. Patients felt the work was endless because each page revealed only what was on it. We bet that progressive disclosure inside a single screen — the user can see the trail, the next step, and the end — would lift completion past 90% even before we touched validation logic.
- Perceived length is more important than actual length.
- Patients abandon forms when they can't see the end.
- Inline validation cuts retry loops by 60%+.